Mateo Solutions
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Personnel
    • Testimonials
  • Services
  • Expertise
    • Water Treatment
    • Metallurgy
    • Slurry Pumping
    • Risk Management
  • Projects
    • Projects
    • Customers
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Form
  • Blog

Antiscalant usage may be highly variable based on seasonal water chemistry changes.

27/9/2018

1 Comment

 
In this example a processing plant was spending in excess of $300K/yr on chemical antiscalant for their process water, yet were still experiencing scaling in the process water lines. The program was maintained at a single dose rate year round, set at a upper limit based on allowable cost. The main form of scale they were aiming to control was Gypsum, which came out of solution once the critical level of sulphate and calcium was reached in the process water, with the sulphates coming from sulphide oxidation in the tailings dam, and the calcium from lime addition for pH control. There were no adequate records of water quality, so a fortnightly monitoring program of water samples was implemented and scale probes were put in place. The mine site was located in a tropical region, with massive input of fresh water in the wet season and evaporation in the dry season. Using the water samples it was determined that minimal antiscalant was required nine months of the year, the previous dose rate for 2 months and double the previous dose rate for the last month of the dry season. The net effect of the modified program was no detectable process water system scale, and chemical program cost of $80K/yr ($280K/yr saving). 

Another effect noticed on the plant was lower selectivity (and hence recovery at target grade) for the zinc flotation circuit. Of note was the addition of copper sulphate and lime prior to the zinc collector (SIBX in this case). It is hypothesised that this was due to scale forming on the active surface of the liberated zinc mineral particles due to the lime addition causing gypsum to form on the surface, but testing to prove this was not conducted, though it was noted that the Zinc grade recovery was better when lime addition was lower during this period of concern.

As you can see from the above example, had the processing personnel received proper support they would have achieved significant savings (the program had been in place for four years, giving a potential indication of a program saving of $880K). An initial audit of their water systems and training of site personnel on how to correctly audit the water chemistry would have cost less than $20K, with perhaps $10K/ yr for ongoing support. That is a fantastic return on investment. Unfortunately the antiscalant supplier at the time did not provide the required technical support. An independent audit costing around $1000-2000 would have identified the issues with the program, and could have designed a solution and trained site personnel to monitor and adjust.

​

1 Comment

Scale formation in Minerals Processing and other processes

25/9/2018

1 Comment

 
Scale control in minerals processing plants is needed when the sum of certain ions in solution exceed the solubility in water under prevailing conditions. While a condition of supersaturation of mineral ions in solution may exist, any sudden change in conditions can cause scale to form in the pipe or vessel. Examples of changes which will cause precipitation of solids from the solution include:
1. Mixing of two or more streams with different chemical make up, resulting in a combined stream which generates a precipitate
2. A sudden pressure drop causing gasses to come out of solution, thus changing the chemistry of the stream and causing a precipitate to form. two common examples in processing plants are at the pump suction (generally off the process water storage tank) and immediately following a flow control valve (i.e. butterfly have controlling water addition to a grinding mill.
3. The addition of a chemical to a processing stream which causes supersaturation then precipitation. an example is addition of lime to process water/slurry causing gypsum to precipitate downstream.

Potential scaling issues are best identified and dealt with in plant/process design (i.e. sizing vessels to maintain operational volume between planned shutdowns for cleaning), but unfortunately not often identified and dealt with at this stage. In most cases the issue of scale only arises once a plant is operational, and thus the need for expert advice should be obtained and a plant audit carried out.

In future blogs I will present a series of examples (identities removed) of scaling issues I have encountered, and the solutions I implemented. I also encourage others to contribute in the comments section, and we can have discussions directly too.

Mateo Solutions personnel have extensive experience in the selection and dosing of antiscalants, and may be able to assist you by auditing your current antiscalant program or working with you or your chemical supplier to achieve the optimum program to suit your needs.

Regards,

​Roger
1 Comment

    Roger's Blog and links

    Case studies and general problem solving tips

    Archives

    October 2018
    September 2018

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.